Progress

Three years of data, plainly told

Three years of data, plainly told

Momentum on two fronts. In the portfolio, how the companies we partner with are engaging with sustainability. As an investor, our firm-level performance and progress towards our targets. We show where we have gained ground, and where we have more work to do.

In the Portfolio

As an investor

Over the past three years, we've seen measurable progress across our portfolio. However, the picture is not uniform and there are areas where we need to focus. The data shows more companies are measuring what matters. Overall, 65% of our portfolio are at or above our sustainability engagement benchmark: meaning they have implemented practices aligned with what we would expect to see of a company similar in size and stage.


There's also been a shift in that engagement towards the later stages where companies are starting to align their practices with what is expected of them as they mature. This is significant, as policy adoption at an early stage is relatively accessible. As they reach Series B and beyond, the ask increases and companies are expected to start doing more. What matters at each stage differs, and we prioritise our support accordingly, focusing on what is genuinely material to each company based on their size, sector, and circumstances

% Portfolio measuring emissions

32%

2025

24%

2024

18%

2023

10%

2022

On environment the trajectory is encouraging, with the proportion of our portfolio measuring their emissions more than tripling since 2022, and the share with active reduction initiatives growing substantially alongside it to 44%. As more companies understand where their emissions stem from, the more likely they are to seek proportionate ways to reduce them.


Among those who have reached our climate maturity threshold — the stage at which we consider it appropriate to start setting targets — 40% have now adopted near-term decarbonisation goals. It’s encouraging progress, but with a 2030 target of 100%, there is still significant ground to cover.

% Portfolio with emission reduction initiatives

44%

2025

31%

2024

20%

2023

14%

2022

% Portfolio at “climate maturity” threshold with emission reduction targets

40%

2025

25%

2024

Governance has also improved consistently, with sustainability policies in place at 62% of portfolio companies, and board-level discussion and accountability all increasing year on year. As the sustainability agenda expands to include AI governance and data ethics, these topics have moved from the periphery to mainstream board agendas as recognised business risks. The acceleration of board-level engagement across our portfolio reflects that shift and we continue to work towards our 100% 2030 target.

% Portfolio with a sustainability policy

62%

2025

52%

2024

43%

2023

28%

2022

% Portfolio discussing sustainability at board

56%

2025

48%

2024

34%

2023

19%

2022

%  Portfolio assigned a board member to sustainability

38%

2025

29%

2024

22%

2023

12%

2022

On the social side, the picture is mixed. Supply chain responsibility is a genuine area of progress. Sustainable supplier policy adoption has more than doubled over two years, and human rights has grown steadily alongside. DEI however, is more complex. Policy adoption has remained broadly flat, sitting at 79% — partly reflecting a shift in our portfolio composition with more US-headquartered companies, and an external environment that has made DEI harder to navigate. It remains a priority, and our commitment to 100% adoption by 2030 is unchanged.

%  Portfolio with a sustainable supplier policy

37%

2025

30%

2024

18%

2023

% Portfolio with a human rights policy

43%

2025

40%

2024

34%

2023

% Portfolio with a DEI policy

79%

2025

81%

2024

72%

2023

47%

2022

The metrics in this section track adoption: the percentage of portfolio companies that have a sustainability policy, discuss it at board, or are measuring their emissions. They tell us about engagement. They don't tell us whether any of it is driving impact or commercial outcomes.


At Atomico, we believe it does. The case studies found in the “In Practise” section make this argument. However we are not yet able to demonstrate it systematically across the portfolio. What we can say is that the companies in our portfolio that engage most seriously with sustainability tend to be the ones that maintain the strongest employer brand and are best prepared for due diligence from future investors and acquirers. Whether that's correlation or causation is a question we intend to keep investigating.

A note on responsible AI

A majority of the companies we partner with are now building with AI as a core component of their products and operations. Questions about how AI systems are governed, how they're tested for bias and safety, and how companies are thinking about their downstream effects are becoming material to how we assess them through our due diligence.


However we don't yet have a consistent framework for measuring this across the portfolio, and we haven't included it as a tracked KPI in this report. This is a deliberate choice. We would rather take the time to get the framework right than measure the wrong thing. This is something we will continue to focus on over the coming months.

In the Portfolio

As an investor

Over the past three years, we've seen measurable progress across our portfolio. However, the picture is not uniform and there are areas where we need to focus. The data shows more companies are measuring what matters. Overall, 65% of our portfolio are at or above our sustainability engagement benchmark: meaning they have implemented practices aligned with what we would expect to see of a company similar in size and stage.


There's also been a shift in that engagement towards the later stages where companies are starting to align their practices with what is expected of them as they mature. This is significant, as policy adoption at an early stage is relatively accessible. As they reach Series B and beyond, the ask increases and companies are expected to start doing more. What matters at each stage differs, and we prioritise our support accordingly, focusing on what is genuinely material to each company based on their size, sector, and circumstances

% Portfolio measuring emissions

32%

2025

24%

2024

18%

2023

10%

2022

On environment the trajectory is encouraging, with the proportion of our portfolio measuring their emissions more than tripling since 2022, and the share with active reduction initiatives growing substantially alongside it to 44%. As more companies understand where their emissions stem from, the more likely they are to seek proportionate ways to reduce them.


Among those who have reached our climate maturity threshold — the stage at which we consider it appropriate to start setting targets — 40% have now adopted near-term decarbonisation goals. It’s encouraging progress, but with a 2030 target of 100%, there is still significant ground to cover.

% Portfolio with emission reduction initiatives

44%

2025

31%

2024

20%

2023

14%

2022

% Portfolio at “climate maturity” threshold with emission reduction targets

40%

2025

25%

2024

Governance has also improved consistently, with sustainability policies in place at 62% of portfolio companies, and board-level discussion and accountability all increasing year on year. As the sustainability agenda expands to include AI governance and data ethics, these topics have moved from the periphery to mainstream board agendas as recognised business risks. The acceleration of board-level engagement across our portfolio reflects that shift and we continue to work towards our 100% 2030 target.

% Portfolio with a sustainability policy

62%

2025

52%

2024

43%

2023

28%

2022

% Portfolio discussing sustainability at board

56%

2025

48%

2024

34%

2023

19%

2022

%  Portfolio assigned a board member to sustainability

38%

2025

29%

2024

22%

2023

12%

2022

On the social side, the picture is mixed. Supply chain responsibility is a genuine area of progress. Sustainable supplier policy adoption has more than doubled over two years, and human rights has grown steadily alongside. DEI however, is more complex. Policy adoption has remained broadly flat, sitting at 79% — partly reflecting a shift in our portfolio composition with more US-headquartered companies, and an external environment that has made DEI harder to navigate. It remains a priority, and our commitment to 100% adoption by 2030 is unchanged.

%  Portfolio with a sustainable supplier policy

37%

2025

30%

2024

18%

2023

% Portfolio with a human rights policy

43%

2025

40%

2024

34%

2023

% Portfolio with a DEI policy

79%

2025

81%

2024

72%

2023

47%

2022

The metrics in this section track adoption: the percentage of portfolio companies that have a sustainability policy, discuss it at board, or are measuring their emissions. They tell us about engagement. They don't tell us whether any of it is driving impact or commercial outcomes.


At Atomico, we believe it does. The case studies found in the “In Practise” section make this argument. However we are not yet able to demonstrate it systematically across the portfolio. What we can say is that the companies in our portfolio that engage most seriously with sustainability tend to be the ones that maintain the strongest employer brand and are best prepared for due diligence from future investors and acquirers. Whether that's correlation or causation is a question we intend to keep investigating.

A note on responsible AI

A majority of the companies we partner with are now building with AI as a core component of their products and operations. Questions about how AI systems are governed, how they're tested for bias and safety, and how companies are thinking about their downstream effects are becoming material to how we assess them through our due diligence.


However we don't yet have a consistent framework for measuring this across the portfolio, and we haven't included it as a tracked KPI in this report. This is a deliberate choice. We would rather take the time to get the framework right than measure the wrong thing. This is something we will continue to focus on over the coming months.

Progress

Our sustainability targets

Our sustainability targets

At Atomico, we strive to lead by example, which is why in 2025 we set proportionate yet ambitious sustainability targets for ourselves as a firm, as well as engagement targets for our portfolio. We continue to work towards these targets and aim to meet them by 2030.


For more information on the work we do on Conscious Scaling, please see our Responsible Investment and Sustainability Policy and our Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Policy.

Climate

Maintain Atomico scope 1 and 2 emissions at 0 tCO2

At least 70% of Atomico total supplier spend to be with suppliers who have a decarbonisation target

100% of all Atomico portfolio companies with >30 FTE to measure their own emissions annually (+1yr Atomico holding period)

100% of all Atomico portfolio companies who have reached the ‘climate maturity threshold’, to adopt a near term decarbonisation target

‘Climate maturity threshold’ 

>$50m revenue

>$250m capital raised

>500 FTEs

+1yr Atomico holding period

Atomico have board seat/observer rights

Commitment to increase our internal carbon fee annually in line with inflation

Social

Hire 50% female and at least 30% minority ethnic backgrounds for all open roles

40% of investments by number in companies with at least one underrepresented (female &/or diverse ethnicity) founders over the life of the fund

100% portfolio companies have a DEI policy (+1yr Atomico holding period)

Governance

100% portfolio companies have a sustainability policy (+1yr Atomico holding period)

100% portfolio companies have a board member responsible for sustainability (+1yr Atomico holding period, Series A+)

Commitment not to invest in follow-on rounds in any portfolio company which is non compliant with its sustainability term sheet clauses

Methodology

Methodology

Carbon emissions calculation

Since 2023 our GHG emissions scopes 1, 2 and 3 (including scope 3.15) have been calculated by Apiday using an approach aligned with the GHG protocol. See here for further details on their methodology. In 2022 our GHG emissions were calculated by Watershed


Each annual figure for scope 3.15 financed emissions reflects the active portfolio composition as of that calendar year only. If a portfolio company has not submitted their annual emissions data in the survey, Apiday & Watershed estimated on their behalf using company location, industry, headcount, valuation, revenue and % ownership.


Internal carbon fee

In 2023 we introduced an internal carbon fee. We chose to differentiate between emissions that our company controls, and for emissions where the responsibility is shared among many actors. The fee we set was;

  • 100 USD/tCO2 for our scope 1, 2 & 3 GHG emissions (excluding 3.15 financed & 3.1 goods & services) i.e emissions we are directly attributable for and are within our control, such as business travel, office expenditure, employee expenditure, capital goods purchases

  • 10 USD/tCO2 for all remaining scope 3 GHG emissions (3.15 financed portfolio & 3.1 goods & services) i.e emissions from external actors which are out of our control, such as our share of our portfolio activities, and activities we ask lawyers, accountants e.t.c to do on our behalf


Each year, we increase our fees in line with UK inflation (based on a rounded average of CPI monthly inflation rates for the previous 12 months). In 2024 the increase was 3%, followed by another 3% increase in 2025. Our current internal carbon fees stand at;

  • 106 USD/tCO2 for our scope 1, 2 & 3 GHG emissions (excluding 3.15 financed & 3.1 goods & services)

  • 10.6 USD/tCO2 for all remaining scope 3 GHG emissions (3.15 financed portfolio & 3.1 goods & services)


Portfolio data collection & analysis

Since 2022 Atomico has run an annual sustainability survey with all its active portfolio companies to collect information on the sustainability practices of the portfolio. The survey is voluntary and in 2025 81 portfolio companies were requested to fill it in, with 84% sharing their information. This compares to 79% of 81 active portfolio companies completing the survey in 2024, 66% of 82 active portfolio companies completing the survey in 2023, and 74% of 78 active portfolio companies completing in 2022. 


Data on sustainability practices in place in the portfolio is asked on a binary (yes or no) basis. Here, only active portfolios are tracked, with the data for the years before the Atomico investment not being backfilled. If the company has previously not submitted any data in the survey, a negative answer is assumed by default. If the company has answered the survey in previous years but failed to do so this reporting year, the same policies are assumed to still be in place unchanged unless we know otherwise. 


We recognise that this introduces a possible bias in the reporting as the number of active companies reporting in each year changes, as does which companies are reporting with some doing some years and not others. Hence, we will continue to work towards a complete coverage rate when reporting on our portfolio activities.

All Rights Reserved

All Rights Reserved